jump to main content
jump to side content (search box)
site map

Paula Loses Iconic Record

22 SEP2011

Paula Radcliffe

A row is brewing in road running among the world's senior bodies in the sport, which centres around the demotion of Paula Radcliffe's iconic marathon run of 2:15:25 at the 2003 London Marathon.

It started at the 2011 International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) World Championships in Daegu, South Korea, where the IAAF Congress passed a motion to change the standard by which female athletes achieve world record performances in road races.

Under the new rules, only times achieved in all-women competitions will be acknowledged for world record purposes, and performances achieved in mixed conditions would now be referred to only as "world best times".

The new criterion means that Radcliffe's 2003 mark of 2:15:25 is no longer the world record but now a world best, and that her 2005 London time of 2:17:42 is the world record. In the earlier race, she was paced by two male runners, whereas two years later she ran alongside fellow female competitors only.

The World Marathon Majors (WMM), which consists of the race directors from London, New York, Boston, Berlin and Chicago and the Association of International Marathons (AIMS) have reacted with anger. Whilst the IAAF's move brings the marathon into line with track running events, the WMM and AIMS believe that it does not represent what is required by the sport of road running.

In a joint statement, they say that they will seek discussions with the IAAF stressing that "the vast majority of women's road races throughout the World are held in mixed conditions" and that the "current situation where the fastest time is not now recognised as a record is confusing and unfair and does not respect the history of our sport."

Comments

  1. Garryb said...

    I think this is a load of nonsense, it's a World Record...... I don't care if the pacers were male or female, she still had to put the work in to get the time.

    Thursday 22nd September 2011 11.39am

  2. Anne Williamson said...

    This is so ridiculous the pace makers didn't run the race for her or give her a co carry she ran every inch of the race on her own feet so why is this record being taken off her. The record should still stand !

    Friday 23rd September 2011 5.18pm

  3. Neil Gow said...

    Setting the new world record at over two minutes slower than the old one is like saying the Eiffel Tower is still the world's tallest building. The gender of the pacemaker seems to me to be irrelevant. What if in an all male race they had faster than average (male) pacemaker runners and some one broke the world record. Would that record also have to be scrapped as well since it was not fair on the runners who had slower pacemaker runners in previous races?

    Saturday 24th September 2011 4.42pm

Add your comment

Before adding your comment:

  • Show good blogging etiquette and keep comments on topic
  • If you use inappropriate or offensive language, your comment may be edited or deleted
  • HTML is not permitted. Any HTML tags included within the comments will be stripped out.
Required contact info:
Optional personal info:
Required comments area:
Required anti-spam question:
(your answer proves you're a person)
Remember your details
Time to contribute

Read through your live comment preview below before adding your comment.

live comment preview

CHSS

Footworks

Loch Ness Marathon

Macmillan

Achilles Heel

Work Play Bags

Paisley Vision 2012

Inverclyde Leisure 5K

Life Fit Physio

Great Edinburgh Run

Fastrax Online

MS Society Scotland

Run Liverpool Marathon

Meningitis Research Fund

Newsletter

For updates, special offers and promotions enter your details below now and receive our regular E-newsletters.

enter name and email
 
 
privacy

View the newsletter archive.

Poll - Where Do You Run

We want to find out where you do most of your running.

Where do you do most of your running

Check out the previous polls.


back to top